Thursday, January 31, 2008

Uncompromising cricket and all the other assorted rot.

Will Ponting ever learn? Here he is as usual pulling the Aussie bullshit:

"We tend to play uncompromising and fair, that's the way we Australians play cricket. We take as much as we give," he said.

Someone should get through to his midget brain that everyone plays uncompromising and fair cricket. Therefore, what makes it Australian?

We have seen for past decade and more what it means. It is just an excuse for bad behaviour.

Pointing should first learn to look beyond his nose, understand that cricket is not his grand father’s property (I use it in the Indian sense), and stop trying to make the obvious profound.

By the way, what is this “we take as much as we give”? Is this what Hayden described as a glitch in the Aussie radar?

 

Dhoni permits chitchat

I ask what the hell?

 

Have they forgotten that they are playing international cricket. A nations pride is at stake and a chartered jet is idling on the tarmac.

 

This is serious business, cut out the chitchat, and get to the core.

 

Go and ground the Aussies to dust.

 

 

 

 

On Walkers and Walking

Bob Simpson on why he decided against walking:

The two main reasons for that were: 1) Most of the major controversies of that time were caused by the so-called walkers turning their backs on umpires and trying to bluff their way through an appeal despite being out. They relied on their reputation as walkers to get away with it. 24578735

2) A number of umpires felt that the batsmen walk after an obvious snick when they had a good score, but stay put even after making a fine contact with the ball when they only had a few runs on the board.

I may be a cynic, but I doubt if I have ever seen a true walker.

 

Actually, as a guy who has done these and more, I agree with Simpson.

Your thoughts?

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Yuvraj unwilling to risk himself

Yuvraj should have been rearing to play and prove himself. Sadly the facts speak otherwise.

Though Yuvraj has been declared fit by physio John Gloster but he is reluctant to test himself out in the first ODI against Australia in Brisbane on February 3.

If the physio has given him a clean bill of health he should play.Readers may remember he pulled the same stunt during the T20 semis. The only charitable reason I can think of is that he trying to prove his indispensability to the team.

The selectors should not permit him to pick and choose when or where he plays.

 

 

The last word on the racism row

That's it guys- this blog feels it is time to leave this topic and go on to other things in cricket.

Disclaimer: However this blogger reserves the right to return to it at his discretion. :)

IPL- Will it choke other sports?

There is a real danger that IPL will suck up all the advertising money, leaving other sports starving for sponsors.

Here are some facts:

A closely fought bidding war recently saw business tycoons and film stars putting in big money to buy the eight IPL teams for anything between Rs272 crore and Rs441 crore.

The next round of auction on February 8 will determine which cricketers will join which team. Media planners are keenly watching the development, and would decide their exact game plan soon. But they are already saying that the advertising pie will grow with IPL coming in.

It is plainly obvious that the IPL will draw many eyeballs and which in turn will attract sponsors and advertising.1900215084_9adcd665da

However, if it becomes wildly popular, as I believe it will be, will there be any money left for other sports?

If there is no sponsor interest, then staging them will prove financially disastrous. Consider this factor too , if there is no advertising revenue, the TV channels will ignore these events thus depriving them off much needed exposure.

Seriously, IPL proves alluring to the money bags, it could sound the death knell for all the other sports.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

The real reason why Bhajji's ban was overturned.

Wonder why CA succumbed?

Cricket Australia was anxious to have the charge dropped because it feared its board would be sued for a figure understood to be about $60 million if India quit the tour. India's broadcast partner, ESPN, owns the lucrative contract to beam cricket from Australia into the subcontinent. If ESPN sued successfully, it could take 10 years to recoup the losses, Cricket Australia told the players

Don't you get it? BCCI with its money power bought ESPN and ESPN now owned by BCCI threatened to sue.

Boohoo! Poor CA, poor Ponting, poor Symonds and by the way poor stump mike.

Yuck!

Manohar does a Jethmalini

Old timers may remember the ploy Ram Jethmalini used to defend Harshad Mehta.

For the benefit of those who missed it, here is a brief. Harshad Mehta was a hotshot stockbroker who was accused of bribing Narasimha Rao, our then PM. One crore rupees in a brief case was supposed to have changed hands. Mehta employed Jethmalini as his advocate. At a press conference Jethmalini physically proved that carrying one crore in a briefcase was impossible. I do not know whether this demo had any legal validity, however nothing more was heard.

Our man V R Manohar, the BCCI-appointed lawyer for defending Harbhajan seems to have taken a leaf out of Jethmalini’s book.

Here he is explaining how he brought upon Bhajji’s acquittal.

"It was also explained that Harbhajan knew Symonds only as an Australian player and nothing more about his race or religion,"

EVIDENCE

Where is the question of intent when there is no prior knowledge? Cheers Mr.Manohar you have blasted the allegations to kingdom come.

A copy of what the stump mike picked up

We don't need it, do it to your teammates (on Harbhajan patting Brett Lee on his back with his bat)

























 

Pati Patni aur Woh!

Pardon my Hindi. I just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that Sri Lanka, who make up the trio in the tri-series, are in Australia and looking to redeem their reputation.

Avid cricket fans are likely to salivate as Sri Lanka not only beat India comprehensively but also went on to lose to Australia in the WC finals. All in all a cracker of an ODI series is in sight.

If we consider their WC form, then we cut a sorry figure, as both Australia and Sri Lanka are far ahead of us.

How many of you are bold enough to say that India is the favorite?

Monday, January 28, 2008

India- a worthy No.2?

Being a true sportsman,Ponting rained wholesome praise on India:

"It was an enjoyable series, a hard-fought contest over the last one month. India played some very good cricket and proved that they are the number two team in the world," Ponting said.

I feel it is a bit premature, India has to beat South Africa comprehensively to be a worthy No.2.

Do you agree?

 

Bhajji is toast

A stump mike 'transcript' evidence has caught the BCCI by surprise and the buzz doing the rounds is that the 'evidence' puts Harbhajan and even Sachin Tendulkar in poor light.

Indications are that the BCCI would refuse to accept it as evidence, however the question remains, whether their refusal stands up to legal scrutiny.

Looks like Harbhajan is toast.

A Way Out

It is unlikely that Harbhajan will escape unscathed. For one it will reflect adversely on all parties concerned.

If it were to happen, India and its cricketing body will stand accused of ‘flexing their financial muscles’. The Australian players will be pilloried for employing dirty tricks, in this case racism, to subjugate their opponents and the ICC will be slammed yet again for being weak- kneed.

Normally this sort of situation an acceptable political compromise is the norm. However, there is one uncompromising element in this mix, the Indian players. They are adamant that Harbhajan is innocent and unwilling to compromise. This adds a complexity to the situation as they have taken the high moral ground by excusing Brad Hogg.

How do you think they will resolve the situation?

 

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Test matches earn more than ODI's

Here is an excerpt from an ECB media release.

The review concluded "excluding overheads and financial costs the average Test match generates a total contribution of about £1.5m for the club".

"On the same basis the average one-day international generates an average total contribution of £240k. 

I was under the impression that Test matches were a losing proposition. The truth is other wise. Both make money, however Tests score over ODI's.

ICC associate members oppose reduction

The associate members of the International Cricket Council (ICC) have opposed moves by India and Pakistan to reduce the number of teams at the next World Cup in 2011.

They allege, “what they actually want is reduce chances of their elimination at the preliminary rounds.

To ensure this, they have suggested only two groups of 14 teams, instead of the current four groups of four teams each.”

I believe the associate members. Do you?

The End Game

The Test series is winding down and Harbhajans ban coming up for review. The BCCI has started cranking up the pressure and as a first step; Procter’s ruling been made public and now the second step

IN AN ominous sign that Bollyline is about to turn toxic, Indian cricket powerbroker Lalit Modi has warned there will be Australian "casualties" from the Sydney Test.

It is an obvious attempt to remind the CAB and the players particularly the 'accusers' that they have a lot to lose. Undoubtedly, the ban will be overturned citing lack of corroborative evidence.

The End game is on.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Tactical claims

Interesting end to the game today, the teams accused each other of playing for a draw.

India's opening batsmen Virender Sehwag accused the Australians of batting defensively because they were "scared" of losing while Australia's Matthew Hayden claimed the Indians had resorted to bowling wides to restrict their scoring opportunities.

Will India claim ‘moral superiority’ (victory) at the end of the series?

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,

Rethinking Azharuddin’s Captaincy

One off field event summed up my impression of Azharruddin’s captaincy. I remember a press conference, Azharuddin when asked about the Warne threat; replied that he has four people (batsmen) who can take care of him. This led me to consider him a Captain who largely relied on his players to come through or to be more exact expected his players to pull their weight.

However, Mark Taylor lists Azharuddin as one his favourite captains because, “The fields he set for spinners would be very good. He’d been captaining for some years before I did and I found those field settings imaginative and effective.”

I would have never associated the word imaginative with Azharuddin or his captaincy. (Despite his apparent lack of imagination, his taste (Sangeeta Bijlani) was impeccable). Maybe, I should revisit my opinion on Azharuddin

Would you rate Azharuddin’s captaincy as ‘imaginative’?

Sachin needs to change to a lighter bat

I know that we have all discussed this threadbare in different forums. However, Spiro Zavos article “Sachin Tendulkar’s bat is too heavy” has some fresh insights. He argues that Sachin probably would have an even more imposing record with a lighter bat.

However, I’ve noticed that Tendulkar often misses with his cross bat shots, the cuts and the hooks that were easy pickings for Don Bradman. To me the reason for this is obvious. The bat Tendulkar uses is just too heavy to get up and then through with his cross bat to deal with the shorter deliveries. Unlike say Brian Lara or Don Bradman, Tendulkar does not make a huge number of massive double centuries. Again, I believe that the heavy bat just gets too heavy over the course of a long innings and he makes a mistake of timing he might not have made with a lighter bat.

I agree with Spiro Zavos, albeit with a difference. I think Sachin needs to change to a lighter bat.

Maybe it is due to wear and tear or even due to the minor changes he had made in his grip to prevent a recurrence of tennis elbow, it is evident that Sachins arms are not as steely as they were before.

Therefore, I posit that the recent spate of ‘played on’ dismissals are due to a combination of weakening forearms and a heavy bat.

Do you agree that Sachin needs to change to a lighter bat?

Friday, January 25, 2008

Will IPL Kill Ranji and Duleep Trophy?

Our very own Kapil ‘ICL’ Dev think so.

I am really concerned if there would be interest left for Ranji and Duleep Trophy matches, the Irani up match, or the matches involving juniors. This way you are luring players into a world where the dazzle of big money can create a disturbing influence, he warned.

On the contrary, these tournaments will draw more players. It will be provide the ‘wannabes’ a platform to display their skills. Granted the money will attract them, nevertheless these tournaments will survive.

What do you say?

ICC Contemplates Action Against Sunil Gavaskar

Amidst accusation of bowing to the BCCI, the ICC managed to wriggle out of the mess in Sydney. Despite other pressing affairs, they have now opened a new front; they have taken on Gavaskar in a belated bid to enforce discipline in their ranks.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) is all set to take action against it's Cricket Committee chairman Sunil Gavaskar for his outburst against match referee Mike Procter, who had slapped a three-Test ban on Indian off-spinner Harbhajan Singh for racist abuse.

Since I am not well versed in the ICC rules, I take it “they have a strong case against Gavaskar”. However, if the BCCI comes out in support of Gavaskar and ICC loses the case, is it another example of BCCI flexing its muscle?

IceRocket Tags: ,,

Thursday, January 24, 2008

How Procter found Harbhajan guilty

I cannot make head or tail of Procter’s statement on Harbhajan ruling.

On one side, it seems he has arrived at the decision going by the evidence proffered. The problem is that all the corroborative evidence comes from the Australian side. That is outwardly logical but how does he negate the motivation. On the other side, he dismisses Tendulkar’s statement saying that he was nowhere near the scene of the ‘crime’.

Apart from this at the end, he says, “Once I had read the verdict to the players, I heard submissions from Chetan Chauhan and Dr.M.V.Sridhar. I gave them some thought five to ten minutes and then I imposed a penalty of a three Test-match ban.”

If we are to take the last statement at face value, it seems that hearing took just a few minutes, but then how does he account for the hearing that went past midnight.

Any conspiracy theories?

ODI's - Dhoni and his 'select' boys have to deliver

Soulberry in his blog post King, Dhoni and Yuvraj muses on the controversy surrounding the omission of Ganguly from the ODI team.

Primarily the story doing the rounds in the media is that the physical trainer King’s report that the lower half of Ganguly could collapse (calf muscles?) caused Dhoni and Yuvraj argue against his inclusion.

Most of the media are reporting the same and Dhoni’s ill –advised press conference has made one believe that there could be some truth to the story, atleast the part played by Dhoni..

In principle, I am with Dhoni. As a Captain, he desired to have a team of his choice and the selectors have done the right thing in giving him just that.

Surprisingly Vengsarkar has also come out smelling roses and commended for supporting his Captain.

Now it is for Dhoni and the boys he has put his faith in to deliver.

Adelaide Test - India goes with a makeshift Opener

Despite the openers, putting in better performance in the last Test, India has gone in with a makeshift opener. (At the time of writing, Irfan Pathan was already out for nine).

I fail to understand the logic behind this. The Perth Test had amply proved the value of genuine openers. Our openers averaged a partnership around 40’s, whereas Australian openers failed to average 30. The initial partnership undoubtedly contributed to the Indian win.

The decision to include five bowlers is a sound strategy. It would have a far greater impact if they included Karthick at the expense of Dhoni. In my estimation, Karthick matches Dhoni in wicket keeping skills. Additionally, he, Karthick, gives us the flexibility to bring in five bowlers without going in for a makeshift opener.

Will we rue this decision?

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Go with five bowlers

If we are serious about winning at Adelaide we need to have five bowlers. The best combination would have Karthick in place of Dhoni.

Karthick is ideal because he can open and obviously keep wickets.This will ensure that we don't go into a crucial Test match with a patently uncomfortable Dravid or an untried Irfan trying to stay afloat at the top.

Technorati Tags: ,

Hayden's 'surge' and 'counter' strategy.

Hayden has revealed that he will take an off-stump guard to counter our swing bowlers. Additionally he has indicated that he will be standing well outside the crease to negate the swing and look to walk down the pitch.

 

Now that Hayden has revealed 'all' here are some suggestions to counter his 'surge'.

 

An immediate strategy that comes to the mind is to bowl short –pitched deliveries. Another is to bowl Harbhajan first – up with the new- ball and disarm him with a doosra.

 

However, the best way to counter his 'surge' would be to bowl an in swinger that will sting his um…-nether regions.

 

Any suggestions?

 

England teases Australia

The ECB yesterday unveiled the logo for the 2009 Ashes series and along with it they are releasing a 'viral video' teasing the Australians about their 2005 Ashes loss.

 

It will be interesting to watch how the Australians react. I assume that they give a hiding that will leave the England 'smarting'?

 

 

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Can you trust a grounds man's word?

Report suggests that the Adelaide pitch is a turner. Not that one distrusts the grounds man's word; it is just that one other worthy had spoken of a fast pitch last week. The pitch was so fast that the match ended in four days.

 

The knowledge and expertise exhibited by the one at Perth has heightened the regard one had for these Super soaker trundlers.

 

Nevertheless, one is still constrained to ask, can we trust the Adelaide grounds man? Is he as capable as the one in Perth?

 

If so, should we pack the side with our version of pace bowlers?

 

 

 

 

 

Glitch on the radar, Hayden's Challenge, Adelaide Test and all that.

One report carries it as glitch on the radar and another says it is a glitch in the radar. All said and done it was Hayden's way of saying the defeat at Perth was just a blip on the Aussie radar. As we all know Hayden is tireless player and tireless he is for in the same breath he has challenged India to prove their superiority at Adelaide.

 

Readers may remember it was just yesterday another and certainly a more garrulous former opener; Sidhu had challenged an honourable Indian selector. Its Hayden's turn today – I mean to challenge.

 

Of the two Hayden's challenge is more invigorating. Just imagine a shoot out between Sehwag and Hayden on Day 1.Better still imagine a shoot out between Sidhu and Hayden.

 

Dare to guess which way the ball would swing?

Monday, January 21, 2008

Tait shelves thunderbolts unsheathes reverse swing

Those of you, who thought Tait was capable of only bowling thunderbolts, be warned he can bowl a mean reverse swinging delivery.

 

Here is his skipper Ricky Ponting, working up lather:

 

"Tait also has the ability to bowl reverse-swing in Adelaide. With his low arm action and the amount of backspin he imparts on the ball, he usually makes it reverse swing more, and earlier, than other bowlers."

 

Good for you Tait, maybe a 170kmph reverse swinging ball will shore up your reputation.

 

 

Sidhu's hyperbole

Sidhu has challenged chairman of selectors Dileep Vengsarkar to an open public debate on Ganguly's omission.

 

"I challenge Mr Vengsarkar to an open debate. If he can convince me on why he dropped Ganguly then I will leave NDTV for a lifetime, otherwise he has to quit. You can't drop because you don't like somebody's face. Otherwise bring in Hema Malini," said Sidhu.

 

I urge Vengsarkar to take up the challenge and win.

 

1)      It will get rid of Sidhu for good.

2)      I prefer Priyanka Chopra playing for India.

 

How will Australia respond?

Having lost a Test, that too after playing in a most 'un' Australian manner, it would be interesting to watch Australia's response.

 

Will they return to their 'snarling' and 'warring' ways or will they continue in the present vein?

 

Personally, I would like Australia to continue their 'Perth' behaviour and respond thus

 

After losing the fourth Test of the 2005 Ashes series at Trent Bridge, Ponting's side went 874 days without experiencing another, including a record-equalling 16-Test winning streak that was ended at the WACA Ground on Saturday.

 

How would you like them to respond?

 

Sunday, January 20, 2008

ODI squad – I am ambivalent

Laxman never had a chance and Dravid’s exclusion was expected. However Ganguly’s exclusion has come as a nasty surprise. My dear friend Niranjan has come out with a silly inflammatory statement as usual.

Now to the crux of the issue, have the selectors chosen the best possible ODI squad?

I would say, no and then yes.

No, because we have excluded Ganguly and saddled with a Yuvraj who has a game leg. Yes, because they have done a good job keeping an eye on the future.

There is one other reason, purely emotional, for my ambivalence. I feel it would be churlish to deny all those wonderful young men who won us the T20 World Cup.

Would you say that my emotional reasoning is justified?

Can sledging win you games?

Often the ECB and its assorted cohorts come out with statements that make you wonder whether they are living in the present.

 

Look at this recent example.

 

"Geoff Miller, the new national selector, says England will be allowed to sledge their opponents in next year's Ashes series, providing they do not go too far."

 

An incredible woolly headed statement. God save England if they believe that sledging is what it takes to win the Ashes.