A Way Out

It is unlikely that Harbhajan will escape unscathed. For one it will reflect adversely on all parties concerned.

If it were to happen, India and its cricketing body will stand accused of ‘flexing their financial muscles’. The Australian players will be pilloried for employing dirty tricks, in this case racism, to subjugate their opponents and the ICC will be slammed yet again for being weak- kneed.

Normally this sort of situation an acceptable political compromise is the norm. However, there is one uncompromising element in this mix, the Indian players. They are adamant that Harbhajan is innocent and unwilling to compromise. This adds a complexity to the situation as they have taken the high moral ground by excusing Brad Hogg.

How do you think they will resolve the situation?

 

Technorati Tags: Harbhajan,Symonds,racism,hearing,ICC,BCCI,Australia,India

Set your house in order.

In all their rightful, though exaggerated anger directed at us, Australians have cleverly diverted attention from their own abysmal record.

Other than a token representation in the form of Symonds, there has never been a player from another race or religion who has played for Australia. (Stuart, correct me if I am wrong).

There are two other points which need explanation:

1.What has ICC done to ensure that everyone has an equal chance to represent Australia? Have they any basis to believe Australia does not practice discrimination during selection. ( Something, similar on SA lines)

2. Has Symonds done anything to ensure others have a fair chance to represent Australia and are not discriminated? ( Similar, if not as effective as Mohammed Ali)

First, let ICC and by default Australia put its own house in order and then let it denounce racism