Former Indian cricket workforce wicket-keeper Farokh Engineer believes that Wriddhiman Saha is a greater wicket-keeper than Rishabh Pant however Pant is an total bundle. While Pant has not performed quite a few restricted overs matches in the current previous, he was most popular over Saha in the just lately concluded Test sequence towards New Zealand. However, the teen did not impress with his bat and that earned him a number of criticism from consultants and followers alike. Engineer mentioned that Pant was in a dilemma whereas batting and was taking part in an ‘unnatural game’.
“Purely on wicketkeeping skills for a Test match, Saha is a better choice. If you compare the batting aspect, Pant can change the complexion of a game. So, playing Pant was not a bad idea. I wouldn’t say it was a disaster. He didn’t do anything wrong behind the stumps,” Engineer mentioned as quoted by Mid-day.
“He [Pant] kept getting beaten. He had to save the Test but at the same time, also needed to get some runs. Had he tried to be flashy, he would have been ostracised for throwing away his wicket. The poor chap was in a dilemma. But when he was at sea, that’s when he should have tried to get behind the ball and play some shots. If I was captain, I would have told him to play his natural game more. He was playing an unnatural game,” he added.
Nayan Mongia, who additionally stored wickets for India in each Tests and ODIs, had a transparent favorite when it got here to selecting between Pant and Saha as he insisted that the wicket-keeper place ought to be stored for a specialist.
“I have always maintained that if Saha is fit and performing, he should be playing in Tests. I have no second thoughts about this. It looks like the team management is looking for a batsman more than a wicketkeeper. Wicketkeeping is a specialist job in Test matches whether it is the spin or pace-friendly situation,” Mongia mentioned