Smith took blame for ball-tampering scandal to save side: Andrew Flintoff – cricket

Former England all-rounder Andrew Flintoff believes the complete Australian group was concerned within the ball-tampering scandal that rocked world cricket in 2018 after which skipper Steve Smith simply “took the blame” to save his aspect.

Smith was suspended for a yr together with David Warner and Cameron Bancroft after being indicted within the sandpaper-gate throughout a Test match in opposition to South Africa in Cape Town.

“I can’t believe that the whole team isn’t in on it. As a bowler, if someone gives me a ball that’s been tampered with, I know initially. One of the things that Steve Smith did is take the blame for everyone else,” Flintoff instructed Talksport.

“Things like ball tampering have gone on for a long, long time and I think it’s just the degrees where you take it. We were accused of putting sweets on the ball. People put suncream on it, tried everything they can.” Smith was additionally banned from taking any management roles for two years – a suspension which has now expired.

Also Read | No cricket in India in near future: BCCI president Ganguly

The England legend stated it’s troublesome to imagine that others within the group didn’t have a clue about what was happening.

“Sandpaper is wrong, but it’s stupid more than anything. But I can’t believe that everyone in the team wasn’t involved in some way or another,” stated Flintoff, who took 400 wickets and scored over 7000 runs in his profession.

Flintoff, who retired from the longer format after the 2009 Ashes, stated he would surrender the whole lot to play another Test for England.

“It’s getting simpler as I’m 42 and don’t assume I ought to be enjoying cricket now, however after I completed at 31, I couldn’t go anyplace close to it, I simply needed to be a cricketer. Still now I might swap the whole lot I do to play another Test match and put on that England badge at Old Trafford another time.

“It’s solely when it’s completed that you simply assume I ought to have cherished it extra. When it’s gone it’s so onerous.”

Source by [author_name]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *