Virat Kohli, Yuvraj Singh or Ravindra Jadeja: Brad Hogg names his pick for India’s best ever fielder – cricket

The Indian cricket group has produced a variety of good fielders within the final decade and a half with names like Yuveaj Singh and Mohammed Kaif incomes loads of reward for their sharp reflexes. Under the management of MS Dhoni and Virat Kohli, India reworked into one of many best fielding sides on the earth with skipper Kohli, veteran Suresh Raina and Ravindra Jadeja being the highest performers. Former Australia spinner Brad Hogg was requested to decide on India’s best ever fielder and he went with Jadeja who has been good within the current previous.

During an interplay of Twitter, he was requested to decide on between Kohli, Jadeja, Yuvraj and Raina in relation to fielding and Hogg replied – “”All 4 are good, would like to bowl having all of them within the inside ring, however Jadeja for me. #hoggytime”.

 

Hogg believes Nathan Lyon has improved quite a bit in the previous couple of years and thats why he’s a greater off-spinner than Ravichandran Ashwin in Test cricket in modern instances.

“I feel Lyon has taken the mantle from Ashwin over the last year just as the best off-spinner, but I love the way both continue to improve their games and not be complacent where they are at,” Hogg stated whereas replying to a fan on Twitter who requested him to fee who’s a greater off-spinner between Ashwin and Lyon in Test cricket.

Ashwin has to this point picked 365 wickets from 71 Tests whereas Lyon has 390 wickets to his identify from 96 Tests.

READ: Kevin Pietersen names bowler he had ‘no idea’ against

However, it appears Hogg drew his conclusion from the truth that Ashwin hasn’t been capable of carry out that nicely in abroad circumstances as in comparison with Lyon.

When it involves restricted-overs cricket, Ashwin has scalped 150 and 52 wickets respectively in 111 ODIs and 46 T20Is respectively. Lyon, however, has performed simply 29 ODIs and a couple of T20Is wherein he has been capable of pick 29 and 1 wicket respectively.

(With IANS inputs)

Source by [author_name]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *